Example 1: Youth Economic Participation
Builds on the Nigeria Youth Livelihood Problem Tree from Lesson 1.1.
| Stakeholder | Category | Why This Category |
|---|---|---|
| Unemployed youth (18-25) | Primary | Directly experiencing unemployment & poverty |
| Parents of youth | Primary | Financially affected; influence youth decisions |
| Youth who dropped out of school | Primary | Experiencing compounded barriers (education + employment) |
| Local employers (small businesses) | Secondary | Know skills gaps; potential partners for training |
| Vocational training providers | Secondary | Technical expertise on training models that work |
| Youth ministry officials | Secondary | Policy influence; access to funding streams |
| Successful young entrepreneurs | Secondary | Role models; practical insights on barriers overcome |
| Community elders/traditional leaders | Secondary | Cultural gatekeepers; community buy-in essential |
| International NGOs in youth sector | Tertiary | Potential future funders; broader network connections |
| Academic researchers | Tertiary | Data/studies on youth employment trends |
Complete Stakeholder Ecosystem
graph TB
%% ========================================
%% CORE PROBLEM AT TOP
%% ========================================
PROBLEM(["🎯 <strong>CORE PROBLEM</strong><br/><br/>Youth Unemployment<br/>in Rural Nigeria<br/><br/><em>From Lesson 1.1</em>"])
%% ========================================
%% PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS SECTION
%% ========================================
subgraph PRIMARY_GROUP ["👥 PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS - Directly Affected"]
direction TB
P1["<strong>Unemployed Youth</strong><br/>(18-25)<br/><br/>📍 Q1: High Power, High Interest<br/>🎯 <em>Manage Closely</em><br/>Weekly focus groups"]
P2["<strong>Parents of Youth</strong><br/><br/>📍 Q1: High Power, High Interest<br/>🎯 <em>Manage Closely</em><br/>Home visits, evening sessions"]
P3["<strong>Youth Dropouts</strong><br/><br/>📍 Q1: High Power, High Interest<br/>🎯 <em>Manage Closely</em><br/>Trauma-informed conversations"]
end
%% ========================================
%% SECONDARY STAKEHOLDERS SECTION
%% ========================================
subgraph SECONDARY_GROUP ["🤝 SECONDARY STAKEHOLDERS - Influence & Expertise"]
direction TB
subgraph S_HIGH_POWER ["High Power, Low Interest"]
S1["<strong>Youth Ministry</strong><br/><br/>🎯 <em>Keep Satisfied</em><br/>Formal presentations"]
S2["<strong>Training Providers</strong><br/><br/>🎯 <em>Keep Satisfied</em><br/>Curriculum partnerships"]
end
subgraph S_HIGH_INTEREST ["Low Power, High Interest"]
S3["<strong>Local Employers</strong><br/><br/>🎯 <em>Keep Informed</em><br/>Quarterly roundtables"]
S4["<strong>Young Entrepreneurs</strong><br/><br/>🎯 <em>Keep Informed</em><br/>Role model interviews"]
S5["<strong>Community Elders</strong><br/><br/>🎯 <em>Keep Informed</em><br/>Cultural guidance"]
end
end
%% ========================================
%% TERTIARY STAKEHOLDERS SECTION
%% ========================================
subgraph TERTIARY_GROUP ["🔗 TERTIARY STAKEHOLDERS - Indirect Interest"]
direction TB
T1["<strong>International NGOs</strong><br/><br/>📍 Q4: Low Power, Low Interest<br/>🎯 <em>Monitor</em><br/>Email updates"]
T2["<strong>Academic Researchers</strong><br/><br/>📍 Q4: Low Power, Low Interest<br/>🎯 <em>Monitor</em><br/>Data sharing"]
end
%% ========================================
%% VERTICAL FLOW CONNECTIONS
%% ========================================
PROBLEM --> PRIMARY_GROUP
PRIMARY_GROUP --> SECONDARY_GROUP
SECONDARY_GROUP --> TERTIARY_GROUP
%% Internal connections
P1 --> P2 --> P3
S1 --> S2
S3 --> S4 --> S5
T1 --> T2
%% ========================================
%% FESTA DESIGN SYSTEM COLORS
%% ========================================
%% Core Problem - Gray stadium node
style PROBLEM fill:#6B7280,stroke:#4B5563,stroke-width:4px,color:#fff
%% Primary Group - Pepper Green
style PRIMARY_GROUP fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#10B981,stroke-width:3px,color:#2A2A2A
style P1 fill:#BBF7D0,stroke:#10B981,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
style P2 fill:#BBF7D0,stroke:#10B981,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
style P3 fill:#BBF7D0,stroke:#10B981,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
%% Secondary Group - Mixed (Leaf/Gold by quadrant)
style SECONDARY_GROUP fill:#ECFCCB,stroke:#72B043,stroke-width:3px,color:#2A2A2A
style S_HIGH_POWER fill:#FEF3C7,stroke:#F59E0B,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
style S_HIGH_INTEREST fill:#D9F99D,stroke:#72B043,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
style S1 fill:#FEF3C7,stroke:#F59E0B,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
style S2 fill:#FEF3C7,stroke:#F59E0B,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
style S3 fill:#D9F99D,stroke:#72B043,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
style S4 fill:#D9F99D,stroke:#72B043,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
style S5 fill:#D9F99D,stroke:#72B043,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
%% Tertiary Group - Gray
style TERTIARY_GROUP fill:#E5E7EB,stroke:#9CA3AF,stroke-width:3px,color:#2A2A2A
style T1 fill:#F3F4F6,stroke:#9CA3AF,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
style T2 fill:#F3F4F6,stroke:#9CA3AF,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
Engagement Strategies Applied
Manage Closely
Youth & parents: weekly focus groups, home visits, childcare provided.
Keep Informed
Employers & entrepreneurs: roundtables and interviews.
Keep Satisfied
Ministry & providers: formal presentations, partner roles.
Monitor
NGOs & researchers: email updates only.
Validating Problem Tree Assumptions
✅ VALIDATED: "Family migration expectations limit local employment (A)"
"My parents keep asking when I'll move to Lagos like my brother." (Samuel, 23), confirmed as a root cause.
🔄 REFINED: "Limited startup capital access (A)"
"The bank wanted collateral we don't have." (Blessing, 24). Split into loan access plus financial literacy.
⚠️ CHALLENGED: "Gender norms limiting participation (A)"
"Women start more businesses, but in the same saturated markets." (Community Elder). Reframed as a lack of options.
❌ REJECTED: "Limited internet access prevents remote work (A)"
"We have internet on our phones. We just don't know what jobs exist." (Chidi, 22). Replaced with digital skills.
New Insights Discovered
- Peer influence: career choices follow friends, not market data
- Trust deficit: past failed programs bred skepticism
Example 2: Maternal Health Project
Categorization
| Stakeholder | Category | Engagement Method |
|---|---|---|
| Pregnant women & new mothers | Primary | Home visits + women's group discussions |
| Traditional birth attendants | Secondary | Respectful partnership meetings |
| Community health workers | Secondary | Focus groups + training needs assessment |
| Clinic nurses & midwives | Secondary | Individual interviews + observation |
| District health officials | Secondary | Formal consultations + data sharing |
Conversation Excerpt: Validating Assumptions
Assumption: "Transportation cost delays care (A)"
Amina: "Transport isn't the biggest problem. The clinic is open when I'm needed at the farm."
💡 Insight: Childcare, permission, and clinic hours mattered more than transport cost.
Impact on Project Design
❌ Original Plan
- • Transport vouchers
- • Build a new clinic
✅ Revised Plan
- • Extend clinic hours
- • Home visits, on-site childcare
Key Patterns Across Examples
1. Primary Stakeholders Always Surprise You
Direct conversations reveal what desk research can't capture.
2. Assumptions Rarely Survive Contact with Reality
Expect 30-50% of your assumptions to be refined or rejected.
Integration with Lesson 1.3
Ready to Synthesize Your Data?
Affinity Diagrams organize this into patterns for your Theory of Change.