Lesson 1.2: Stakeholder Mapping & Engagement

Real-World Examples

Complete stakeholder maps, with conversations that validate Problem Tree assumptions.

Example 1: Youth Economic Participation

Builds on the Nigeria Youth Livelihood Problem Tree from Lesson 1.1.

Stakeholder Category Why This Category
Unemployed youth (18-25) Primary Directly experiencing unemployment & poverty
Parents of youth Primary Financially affected; influence youth decisions
Youth who dropped out of school Primary Experiencing compounded barriers (education + employment)
Local employers (small businesses) Secondary Know skills gaps; potential partners for training
Vocational training providers Secondary Technical expertise on training models that work
Youth ministry officials Secondary Policy influence; access to funding streams
Successful young entrepreneurs Secondary Role models; practical insights on barriers overcome
Community elders/traditional leaders Secondary Cultural gatekeepers; community buy-in essential
International NGOs in youth sector Tertiary Potential future funders; broader network connections
Academic researchers Tertiary Data/studies on youth employment trends

Complete Stakeholder Ecosystem

graph TB
    %% ========================================
    %% CORE PROBLEM AT TOP
    %% ========================================

    PROBLEM(["🎯 <strong>CORE PROBLEM</strong><br/><br/>Youth Unemployment<br/>in Rural Nigeria<br/><br/><em>From Lesson 1.1</em>"])

    %% ========================================
    %% PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS SECTION
    %% ========================================

    subgraph PRIMARY_GROUP ["👥 PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS - Directly Affected"]
        direction TB
        P1["<strong>Unemployed Youth</strong><br/>(18-25)<br/><br/>📍 Q1: High Power, High Interest<br/>🎯 <em>Manage Closely</em><br/>Weekly focus groups"]
        P2["<strong>Parents of Youth</strong><br/><br/>📍 Q1: High Power, High Interest<br/>🎯 <em>Manage Closely</em><br/>Home visits, evening sessions"]
        P3["<strong>Youth Dropouts</strong><br/><br/>📍 Q1: High Power, High Interest<br/>🎯 <em>Manage Closely</em><br/>Trauma-informed conversations"]
    end

    %% ========================================
    %% SECONDARY STAKEHOLDERS SECTION
    %% ========================================

    subgraph SECONDARY_GROUP ["🤝 SECONDARY STAKEHOLDERS - Influence & Expertise"]
        direction TB

        subgraph S_HIGH_POWER ["High Power, Low Interest"]
            S1["<strong>Youth Ministry</strong><br/><br/>🎯 <em>Keep Satisfied</em><br/>Formal presentations"]
            S2["<strong>Training Providers</strong><br/><br/>🎯 <em>Keep Satisfied</em><br/>Curriculum partnerships"]
        end

        subgraph S_HIGH_INTEREST ["Low Power, High Interest"]
            S3["<strong>Local Employers</strong><br/><br/>🎯 <em>Keep Informed</em><br/>Quarterly roundtables"]
            S4["<strong>Young Entrepreneurs</strong><br/><br/>🎯 <em>Keep Informed</em><br/>Role model interviews"]
            S5["<strong>Community Elders</strong><br/><br/>🎯 <em>Keep Informed</em><br/>Cultural guidance"]
        end
    end

    %% ========================================
    %% TERTIARY STAKEHOLDERS SECTION
    %% ========================================

    subgraph TERTIARY_GROUP ["🔗 TERTIARY STAKEHOLDERS - Indirect Interest"]
        direction TB
        T1["<strong>International NGOs</strong><br/><br/>📍 Q4: Low Power, Low Interest<br/>🎯 <em>Monitor</em><br/>Email updates"]
        T2["<strong>Academic Researchers</strong><br/><br/>📍 Q4: Low Power, Low Interest<br/>🎯 <em>Monitor</em><br/>Data sharing"]
    end

    %% ========================================
    %% VERTICAL FLOW CONNECTIONS
    %% ========================================

    PROBLEM --> PRIMARY_GROUP
    PRIMARY_GROUP --> SECONDARY_GROUP
    SECONDARY_GROUP --> TERTIARY_GROUP

    %% Internal connections
    P1 --> P2 --> P3
    S1 --> S2
    S3 --> S4 --> S5
    T1 --> T2

    %% ========================================
    %% FESTA DESIGN SYSTEM COLORS
    %% ========================================

    %% Core Problem - Gray stadium node
    style PROBLEM fill:#6B7280,stroke:#4B5563,stroke-width:4px,color:#fff

    %% Primary Group - Pepper Green
    style PRIMARY_GROUP fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#10B981,stroke-width:3px,color:#2A2A2A
    style P1 fill:#BBF7D0,stroke:#10B981,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
    style P2 fill:#BBF7D0,stroke:#10B981,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
    style P3 fill:#BBF7D0,stroke:#10B981,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A

    %% Secondary Group - Mixed (Leaf/Gold by quadrant)
    style SECONDARY_GROUP fill:#ECFCCB,stroke:#72B043,stroke-width:3px,color:#2A2A2A
    style S_HIGH_POWER fill:#FEF3C7,stroke:#F59E0B,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
    style S_HIGH_INTEREST fill:#D9F99D,stroke:#72B043,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
    style S1 fill:#FEF3C7,stroke:#F59E0B,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
    style S2 fill:#FEF3C7,stroke:#F59E0B,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
    style S3 fill:#D9F99D,stroke:#72B043,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
    style S4 fill:#D9F99D,stroke:#72B043,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
    style S5 fill:#D9F99D,stroke:#72B043,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A

    %% Tertiary Group - Gray
    style TERTIARY_GROUP fill:#E5E7EB,stroke:#9CA3AF,stroke-width:3px,color:#2A2A2A
    style T1 fill:#F3F4F6,stroke:#9CA3AF,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A
    style T2 fill:#F3F4F6,stroke:#9CA3AF,stroke-width:2px,color:#2A2A2A

Engagement Strategies Applied

Manage Closely

Youth & parents: weekly focus groups, home visits, childcare provided.

Keep Informed

Employers & entrepreneurs: roundtables and interviews.

Keep Satisfied

Ministry & providers: formal presentations, partner roles.

Monitor

NGOs & researchers: email updates only.

Validating Problem Tree Assumptions

✅ VALIDATED: "Family migration expectations limit local employment (A)"

"My parents keep asking when I'll move to Lagos like my brother." (Samuel, 23), confirmed as a root cause.

🔄 REFINED: "Limited startup capital access (A)"

"The bank wanted collateral we don't have." (Blessing, 24). Split into loan access plus financial literacy.

⚠️ CHALLENGED: "Gender norms limiting participation (A)"

"Women start more businesses, but in the same saturated markets." (Community Elder). Reframed as a lack of options.

❌ REJECTED: "Limited internet access prevents remote work (A)"

"We have internet on our phones. We just don't know what jobs exist." (Chidi, 22). Replaced with digital skills.

New Insights Discovered

  • Peer influence: career choices follow friends, not market data
  • Trust deficit: past failed programs bred skepticism

Example 2: Maternal Health Project

Categorization

Stakeholder Category Engagement Method
Pregnant women & new mothers Primary Home visits + women's group discussions
Traditional birth attendants Secondary Respectful partnership meetings
Community health workers Secondary Focus groups + training needs assessment
Clinic nurses & midwives Secondary Individual interviews + observation
District health officials Secondary Formal consultations + data sharing

Conversation Excerpt: Validating Assumptions

Assumption: "Transportation cost delays care (A)"

Amina: "Transport isn't the biggest problem. The clinic is open when I'm needed at the farm."

💡 Insight: Childcare, permission, and clinic hours mattered more than transport cost.

Impact on Project Design

❌ Original Plan

  • • Transport vouchers
  • • Build a new clinic

✅ Revised Plan

  • • Extend clinic hours
  • • Home visits, on-site childcare

Key Patterns Across Examples

1. Primary Stakeholders Always Surprise You

Direct conversations reveal what desk research can't capture.

2. Assumptions Rarely Survive Contact with Reality

Expect 30-50% of your assumptions to be refined or rejected.

Integration with Lesson 1.3

Ready to Synthesize Your Data?

Affinity Diagrams organize this into patterns for your Theory of Change.

Lesson 1.2: Stakeholder Mapping 91%
Step 10 of 11 · Examples