Diagrams & Visuals - Synthesize Data
Visual Reference Library
All 7 diagrams from Lesson 1.3, using Festa colors consistently: green for validated findings, gold for decisions.
1. Four-Phase Affinity Diagram Process
graph TB
Start["🎯 START: STAKEHOLDER INSIGHTS<br/><br/>Raw data from Lesson 1.2:<br/>• Interview notes<br/>• Focus group transcripts<br/>• Observation records<br/>• Survey responses"]
Phase1["📋 PHASE 1: CAPTURE<br/>(45-60 minutes)<br/><br/>Steps:<br/>• Extract one insight per card<br/>• Use stakeholder's own words<br/>• Add source attribution<br/>• Include context markers<br/><br/>Quality Check:<br/>✓ Specific and actionable<br/>✓ Source clearly marked<br/>✓ Both supportive & challenging"]
Phase2["🔍 PHASE 2: CLUSTER<br/>(30-45 minutes)<br/><br/>Steps:<br/>• Spread all cards visibly<br/>• Group by natural affinity<br/>• Trust your instincts<br/>• Allow for outliers<br/><br/>Refine:<br/>• Split if too diverse<br/>• Merge if too similar<br/>• Let insights move"]
Phase3["🏷️ PHASE 3: THEME<br/>(30-40 minutes)<br/><br/>Steps:<br/>• Examine each cluster<br/>• Create descriptive headers<br/>• Use community language<br/>• Test theme accuracy<br/><br/>Document:<br/>• 2-3 sentence descriptions<br/>• Key supporting quotes<br/>• Stakeholder groups"]
Phase4["🔄 PHASE 4: SYNTHESIZE<br/>(20-30 minutes)<br/><br/>Steps:<br/>• Map theme relationships<br/>• Identify priority themes<br/>• Extract implications<br/><br/>Prioritize by:<br/>• Frequency across stakeholders<br/>• Intensity of emphasis<br/>• Impact on Problem Tree"]
Output["📊 SYNTHESIZED INSIGHTS<br/><br/>5-12 clear themes with:<br/>• Evidence from multiple sources<br/>• Community priorities identified<br/>• Problem Tree refinements ready<br/>• Action implications clear"]
Start --> Phase1
Phase1 --> Phase2
Phase2 --> Phase3
Phase3 --> Phase4
Phase4 --> Output
style Start fill:#F8CC1B,stroke:#CA8A04,color:#2A2A2A,stroke-width:2px
style Phase1 fill:#72B043,stroke:#5b7c37,color:#fff,stroke-width:2px
style Phase2 fill:#FDBA74,stroke:#F37324,color:#2A2A2A,stroke-width:2px
style Phase3 fill:#FDE047,stroke:#F8CC1B,color:#2A2A2A,stroke-width:2px
style Phase4 fill:#A3D977,stroke:#72B043,color:#2A2A2A,stroke-width:2px
style Output fill:#007F4E,stroke:#00b369,color:#fff,stroke-width:3px
The Core Synthesis Methodology
Four phases: Capture extracts quality data, Cluster reveals patterns, Theme names them, Synthesize connects them to your Problem Tree.
See also: Four-Phase Process
2. Problem Tree + Affinity Integration Workflow
graph TB
L11["📊 LESSON 1.1<br/>Problem Tree Analysis<br/><br/>OUTPUT:<br/>• Core problem identified<br/>• Root causes mapped<br/>• Effects documented<br/>• Items tagged (E) or (A)"]
L12["🤝 LESSON 1.2<br/>Stakeholder Engagement<br/><br/>OUTPUT:<br/>• 30-80 stakeholder insights<br/>• Multiple perspectives<br/>• Validations & challenges<br/>• New information"]
Affinity["🧩 LESSON 1.3<br/>Affinity Diagram Synthesis<br/><br/>PROCESS:<br/>Capture → Cluster →<br/>Theme → Synthesize"]
Themes["🏷️ AFFINITY THEMES<br/><br/>5-12 themes emerge:<br/>• Community priorities<br/>• Validated patterns<br/>• Contradictions explored<br/>• Surprises documented"]
subgraph Integration["🔄 INTEGRATION ACTIONS"]
I1["Convert (A) → (E)<br/><br/>Assumptions validated<br/>by community become<br/>evidence-based findings"]
I2["Add New Elements<br/><br/>Community revealed<br/>causes or effects<br/>not in original tree"]
I3["Revise Existing Elements<br/><br/>Refine language to<br/>reflect community voice<br/>and priorities"]
I4["Challenge Assumptions<br/><br/>Stakeholders contradicted<br/>desk research —<br/>community truth prevails"]
I5["Identify Gaps<br/><br/>What's still uncertain?<br/>What needs deeper<br/>exploration?"]
end
Updated["🌳 UPDATED PROBLEM TREE<br/><br/>Community-validated analysis:<br/>• More (E) evidence<br/>• Fewer (A) assumptions<br/>• Community language<br/>• Locally grounded<br/>• Credible to funders"]
L14["➡️ LESSON 1.4<br/>Theory of Change<br/><br/>Refined Problem Tree<br/>becomes foundation for<br/>change logic design"]
L11 --> Affinity
L12 --> Affinity
Affinity --> Themes
Themes --> Integration
I1 --> Updated
I2 --> Updated
I3 --> Updated
I4 --> Updated
I5 --> Updated
Updated --> L14
L11 -.->|Original tree| Integration
L12 -.->|Raw insights| Affinity
Themes -.->|Evidence base| Updated
style L11 fill:#E12729,stroke:#B91C1C,color:#fff
style L12 fill:#F37324,stroke:#EA580C,color:#fff
style Affinity fill:#F8CC1B,stroke:#CA8A04,color:#2A2A2A,stroke-width:3px
style Themes fill:#72B043,stroke:#5b7c37,color:#fff
style Integration fill:#007F4E,stroke:#00b369,color:#fff,stroke-width:2px
style I1 fill:#72B043,stroke:#5b7c37,color:#fff
style I2 fill:#72B043,stroke:#5b7c37,color:#fff
style I3 fill:#72B043,stroke:#5b7c37,color:#fff
style I4 fill:#72B043,stroke:#5b7c37,color:#fff
style I5 fill:#72B043,stroke:#5b7c37,color:#fff
style Updated fill:#007F4E,stroke:#00b369,color:#fff,stroke-width:3px
style L14 fill:#72B043,stroke:#007F4E,color:#fff,stroke-width:3px
How Three Lessons Converge
Lesson 1.3 bridges Problem Tree analysis (1.1) and stakeholder engagement (1.2). Five integration actions move your tree from desk-research assumptions to community-validated evidence, ready for Theory of Change.
See also: Integration with Problem Tree
3. Insight Capture Quality Decision Flow
graph TB
Start["📝 STAKEHOLDER INSIGHT<br/><br/>Statement from interview,<br/>focus group, or observation"]
Q1{"Is it a<br/>discrete insight?"}
Split["🔀 SPLIT INTO MULTIPLE CARDS<br/><br/>If statement contains multiple<br/>distinct insights, separate them"]
Q2{"Uses stakeholder's<br/>own language?"}
Preserve["✏️ PRESERVE ORIGINAL WORDING<br/><br/>Use quotes when possible<br/>Don't paraphrase yet"]
Q3{"Source clearly<br/>attributed?"}
AddSource["🏷️ ADD SOURCE INFORMATION<br/><br/>• Which stakeholder/group?<br/>• What question/topic?<br/>• Date/location<br/>• Context notes"]
Q4{"Specific enough<br/>to be actionable?"}
AddContext["📋 ADD CONTEXTUAL DETAILS<br/><br/>Include enough specificity<br/>to understand meaning later"]
Q5{"Both supportive<br/>& challenging<br/>insights included?"}
Balance["⚖️ ENSURE BALANCE<br/><br/>Don't cherry-pick insights<br/>that confirm assumptions<br/><br/>Include contradictions"]
Ready["✅ READY FOR CLUSTERING<br/><br/>Well-captured insight card"]
Start --> Q1
Q1 -->|No, multiple ideas| Split
Q1 -->|Yes| Q2
Split --> Q2
Q2 -->|No| Preserve
Q2 -->|Yes| Q3
Preserve --> Q3
Q3 -->|No| AddSource
Q3 -->|Yes| Q4
AddSource --> Q4
Q4 -->|No| AddContext
Q4 -->|Yes| Q5
AddContext --> Q5
Q5 -->|Check overall| Balance
Q5 -->|Balanced| Ready
Balance --> Ready
style Start fill:#F6F6F6,stroke:#737373,color:#2A2A2A
style Q1 fill:#F8CC1B,stroke:#CA8A04,color:#2A2A2A
style Q2 fill:#F8CC1B,stroke:#CA8A04,color:#2A2A2A
style Q3 fill:#F8CC1B,stroke:#CA8A04,color:#2A2A2A
style Q4 fill:#F8CC1B,stroke:#CA8A04,color:#2A2A2A
style Q5 fill:#F8CC1B,stroke:#CA8A04,color:#2A2A2A
style Split fill:#F37324,stroke:#EA580C,color:#fff
style Preserve fill:#F37324,stroke:#EA580C,color:#fff
style AddSource fill:#F37324,stroke:#EA580C,color:#fff
style AddContext fill:#F37324,stroke:#EA580C,color:#fff
style Balance fill:#F37324,stroke:#EA580C,color:#fff
style Ready fill:#007F4E,stroke:#00b369,color:#fff,stroke-width:3px
Quality Starts at Capture
Each card should be discrete, in the stakeholder's words, attributed, specific, and balanced. Fixing these before clustering saves hours of confusion later.
See also: Four-Phase Process
4. Theme Quality Assessment Flow
graph TB
Theme["🏷️ PROPOSED THEME<br/><br/>Theme header for<br/>a cluster of insights"]
Test1["✅ TEST 1: Represents ALL Insights?<br/><br/>Does theme accurately capture<br/>every insight in the cluster?"]
Decision1{"Pass?"}
Refine1["🔄 REFINE THEME<br/><br/>Make theme more inclusive<br/>or split cluster"]
Test2["✅ TEST 2: Specific Enough?<br/><br/>Is theme actionable and clear,<br/>not vague or generic?"]
Decision2{"Pass?"}
Refine2["🔄 ADD SPECIFICITY<br/><br/>Make theme more concrete<br/>and action-oriented"]
Test3["✅ TEST 3: Community Voice?<br/><br/>Does theme use stakeholder<br/>language and priorities?"]
Decision3{"Pass?"}
Refine3["🔄 INCORPORATE LANGUAGE<br/><br/>Use community terms<br/>and framing"]
Test4["✅ TEST 4: Multiple Sources?<br/><br/>Is theme grounded in insights<br/>from diverse stakeholders?"]
Decision4{"Pass?"}
Refine4["🔄 CHECK REPRESENTATION<br/><br/>Ensure theme reflects<br/>multiple perspectives"]
Test5["✅ TEST 5: Clear Implications?<br/><br/>Does theme suggest action<br/>or Problem Tree connection?"]
Decision5{"Pass?"}
Refine5["🔄 CLARIFY IMPLICATIONS<br/><br/>Make connection to<br/>problem analysis explicit"]
Approved["🎯 QUALITY THEME<br/><br/>Ready for synthesis phase"]
Theme --> Test1
Test1 --> Decision1
Decision1 -->|No| Refine1
Decision1 -->|Yes| Test2
Refine1 --> Test1
Test2 --> Decision2
Decision2 -->|No| Refine2
Decision2 -->|Yes| Test3
Refine2 --> Test2
Test3 --> Decision3
Decision3 -->|No| Refine3
Decision3 -->|Yes| Test4
Refine3 --> Test3
Test4 --> Decision4
Decision4 -->|No| Refine4
Decision4 -->|Yes| Test5
Refine4 --> Test4
Test5 --> Decision5
Decision5 -->|No| Refine5
Decision5 -->|Yes| Approved
Refine5 --> Test5
style Theme fill:#F6F6F6,stroke:#737373,color:#2A2A2A
style Test1 fill:#007F4E,stroke:#00b369,color:#fff
style Test2 fill:#007F4E,stroke:#00b369,color:#fff
style Test3 fill:#007F4E,stroke:#00b369,color:#fff
style Test4 fill:#007F4E,stroke:#00b369,color:#fff
style Test5 fill:#007F4E,stroke:#00b369,color:#fff
style Decision1 fill:#F8CC1B,stroke:#CA8A04,color:#2A2A2A
style Decision2 fill:#F8CC1B,stroke:#CA8A04,color:#2A2A2A
style Decision3 fill:#F8CC1B,stroke:#CA8A04,color:#2A2A2A
style Decision4 fill:#F8CC1B,stroke:#CA8A04,color:#2A2A2A
style Decision5 fill:#F8CC1B,stroke:#CA8A04,color:#2A2A2A
style Refine1 fill:#E12729,stroke:#B91C1C,color:#fff
style Refine2 fill:#E12729,stroke:#B91C1C,color:#fff
style Refine3 fill:#E12729,stroke:#B91C1C,color:#fff
style Refine4 fill:#E12729,stroke:#B91C1C,color:#fff
style Refine5 fill:#E12729,stroke:#B91C1C,color:#fff
style Approved fill:#72B043,stroke:#007F4E,color:#fff,stroke-width:3px
Five Tests for Theme Quality
A theme should be complete, specific, grounded in community voice, drawn from multiple sources, and connected to clear implications. Weak themes create confusion downstream.
See also: Quality Checklist
5. Nigeria Youth Synthesis Example
graph TB
Insights["💬 47 STAKEHOLDER INSIGHTS<br/><br/>From 45 stakeholders across<br/>8 groups (youth, employers,<br/>trainers, leaders, etc.)"]
subgraph Cluster1["📦 CLUSTER 1: 12 insights"]
C1["Sample Insights:<br/><br/>'Vocational graduates can't<br/>solve real workplace problems'<br/><br/>'Training programs teach<br/>outdated techniques'<br/><br/>'Employers need soft skills<br/>but schools focus on technical'"]
end
Theme1["🏷️ THEME 1:<br/>Skills-Market Disconnect<br/><br/>Training Misaligned with<br/>Employer Needs<br/><br/>Priority: HIGH<br/>Sources: 8 stakeholder types"]
subgraph Cluster2["📦 CLUSTER 2: 8 insights"]
C2["Sample Insights:<br/><br/>'Transportation costs eat up<br/>30% of potential wages'<br/><br/>'Can't afford to travel to<br/>training or job interviews'<br/><br/>'No internet in rural areas<br/>for remote work'"]
end
Theme2["🏷️ THEME 2:<br/>Geographic Access Barriers<br/><br/>Transport & Infrastructure<br/>Limit Opportunities<br/><br/>Priority: HIGH<br/>Sources: 5 stakeholder types"]
subgraph Cluster3["📦 CLUSTER 3: 10 insights"]
C3["Sample Insights:<br/><br/>'Young women face family<br/>pressure not to travel'<br/><br/>'Gender norms affect which<br/>jobs are considered acceptable'<br/><br/>'Women lack access to<br/>business networks'"]
end
Theme3["🏷️ THEME 3:<br/>Gender & Cultural Barriers<br/><br/>Social Expectations<br/>Restrict Participation<br/><br/>Priority: MEDIUM<br/>Sources: 4 stakeholder types"]
subgraph Cluster4["📦 CLUSTER 4: 9 insights"]
C4["Sample Insights:<br/><br/>'Previous programs failed<br/>because no real jobs'<br/><br/>'Training without employer<br/>connections is useless'<br/><br/>'Need mentors who actually<br/>succeeded in business'"]
end
Theme4["🏷️ THEME 4:<br/>Program Design Failures<br/><br/>Past Interventions Lacked<br/>Market Connection<br/><br/>Priority: HIGH<br/>Sources: 6 stakeholder types"]
Integration["🔄 PROBLEM TREE INTEGRATION<br/><br/>Actions Taken:<br/>• Theme 1 → Enhanced 'Skills<br/> mismatch' cause (A→E)<br/>• Theme 2 → Added 'Transport<br/> barriers' as new cause<br/>• Theme 3 → Added 'Gender norms'<br/> as underlying cause<br/>• Theme 4 → Informed activity<br/> design principles"]
Updated["🌳 UPDATED PROBLEM TREE<br/><br/>Now includes:<br/>• 15 evidence-based causes (E)<br/>• 5 assumptions for follow-up (A)<br/>• Community language throughout<br/>• Gender considerations explicit<br/>• Past failure lessons integrated"]
Insights --> Cluster1
Insights --> Cluster2
Insights --> Cluster3
Insights --> Cluster4
Cluster1 --> Theme1
Cluster2 --> Theme2
Cluster3 --> Theme3
Cluster4 --> Theme4
Theme1 --> Integration
Theme2 --> Integration
Theme3 --> Integration
Theme4 --> Integration
Integration --> Updated
style Insights fill:#F8CC1B,stroke:#CA8A04,color:#2A2A2A,stroke-width:2px
style Cluster1 fill:#F6F6F6,stroke:#737373,color:#2A2A2A
style Cluster2 fill:#F6F6F6,stroke:#737373,color:#2A2A2A
style Cluster3 fill:#F6F6F6,stroke:#737373,color:#2A2A2A
style Cluster4 fill:#F6F6F6,stroke:#737373,color:#2A2A2A
style C1 fill:#E5E5E5,stroke:#737373,color:#2A2A2A
style C2 fill:#E5E5E5,stroke:#737373,color:#2A2A2A
style C3 fill:#E5E5E5,stroke:#737373,color:#2A2A2A
style C4 fill:#E5E5E5,stroke:#737373,color:#2A2A2A
style Theme1 fill:#E12729,stroke:#B91C1C,color:#fff
style Theme2 fill:#E12729,stroke:#B91C1C,color:#fff
style Theme3 fill:#F37324,stroke:#EA580C,color:#fff
style Theme4 fill:#E12729,stroke:#B91C1C,color:#fff
style Integration fill:#007F4E,stroke:#00b369,color:#fff,stroke-width:2px
style Updated fill:#72B043,stroke:#007F4E,color:#fff,stroke-width:3px
Real-World Application
47 insights from 45 stakeholders produced 4 prioritized themes, each with real quotes and a documented Problem Tree update, defensible to funders.
See also: Examples
6. Synthesis Quality Indicators
graph TB
Complete["📊 COMPLETE AFFINITY ANALYSIS<br/><br/>Ready for quality assessment"]
subgraph Quality["✅ QUALITY INDICATORS"]
Q1["Pattern Recognition<br/><br/>✓ Themes show genuine patterns<br/>✓ Some themes surprised you<br/>✓ Themes suggest interventions<br/>✓ Contradictions acknowledged"]
Q2["Community Voice Preservation<br/><br/>✓ Themes use stakeholder language<br/>✓ Different perspectives captured<br/>✓ Cultural context evident<br/>✓ Power dynamics noted"]
Q3["Integration Strength<br/><br/>✓ Problem Tree strengthened<br/>✓ Clear evidence trail<br/>✓ Community-grounded analysis<br/>✓ Foundation for Theory of Change"]
Q4["Process Rigor<br/><br/>✓ Multiple stakeholder types<br/>✓ Systematic capture & clustering<br/>✓ Themes tested for quality<br/>✓ Documentation comprehensive"]
end
Check{"All quality<br/>indicators<br/>met?"}
subgraph Pitfalls["⚠️ COMMON PITFALLS TO AVOID"]
P1["Confirmation Bias<br/><br/>❌ Only validating assumptions<br/>❌ Dismissing contradictions<br/>❌ Cherry-picking quotes<br/>❌ Missing surprises"]
P2["Over-Simplification<br/><br/>❌ Themes too broad<br/>❌ Combining distinct issues<br/>❌ Smoothing over contradictions<br/>❌ Losing important nuance"]
P3["Analysis Paralysis<br/><br/>❌ Too many micro-themes<br/>❌ Stuck on perfect clustering<br/>❌ Failing to synthesize<br/>❌ Missing action implications"]
end
Pass["🎉 READY FOR LESSON 1.4<br/><br/>Strong foundation for<br/>Theory of Change development"]
Refine["🔄 REFINE ANALYSIS<br/><br/>Address quality gaps<br/>or avoid pitfalls"]
Complete --> Quality
Quality --> Check
Check -->|Yes| Pass
Check -->|No| Pitfalls
Pitfalls --> Refine
Refine --> Quality
style Complete fill:#F6F6F6,stroke:#737373,color:#2A2A2A
style Quality fill:#007F4E,stroke:#00b369,color:#fff,stroke-width:2px
style Q1 fill:#72B043,stroke:#5b7c37,color:#fff
style Q2 fill:#72B043,stroke:#5b7c37,color:#fff
style Q3 fill:#72B043,stroke:#5b7c37,color:#fff
style Q4 fill:#72B043,stroke:#5b7c37,color:#fff
style Check fill:#F8CC1B,stroke:#CA8A04,color:#2A2A2A
style Pitfalls fill:#E12729,stroke:#B91C1C,color:#fff,stroke-width:2px
style P1 fill:#FCA5A5,stroke:#E12729,color:#2A2A2A
style P2 fill:#FCA5A5,stroke:#E12729,color:#2A2A2A
style P3 fill:#FCA5A5,stroke:#E12729,color:#2A2A2A
style Pass fill:#72B043,stroke:#007F4E,color:#fff,stroke-width:3px
style Refine fill:#F37324,stroke:#EA580C,color:#fff
Self-Assessment Framework
Before Lesson 1.4, check pattern recognition, community voice, integration strength, and process rigor. Watch for confirmation bias, over-simplification, and analysis paralysis.
See also: Quality Checklist
7. Module 1 Culmination - Lessons 1.1 to 1.4 Integration
graph TB
L11["📊 LESSON 1.1<br/>Problem Tree Analysis<br/><br/>Preliminary analysis:<br/>• Evidence from desk review<br/>• Assumptions identified<br/>• Validation questions prepared"]
L12["🤝 LESSON 1.2<br/>Stakeholder Engagement<br/><br/>Community validation:<br/>• 30-80 insights collected<br/>• Multiple perspectives<br/>• Assumptions tested<br/>• New insights emerged"]
L13["🧩 LESSON 1.3<br/>Affinity Diagram Synthesis<br/><br/>Pattern recognition:<br/>• 5-12 themes identified<br/>• Community priorities clear<br/>• Problem Tree refined<br/>• Evidence strengthened"]
subgraph Outputs["📋 MODULE 1 OUTPUTS"]
O1["Refined Problem Tree<br/><br/>• Community-validated<br/>• Evidence-based<br/>• Locally grounded<br/>• Credible analysis"]
O2["Stakeholder Relationships<br/><br/>• Trust established<br/>• Partnerships forming<br/>• Ongoing engagement<br/>• Local ownership"]
O3["Community Priorities<br/><br/>• Clear themes<br/>• Action implications<br/>• Success criteria<br/>• Intervention points"]
O4["Evidence Foundation<br/><br/>• Multiple sources<br/>• Systematic analysis<br/>• Documented process<br/>• Audit trail"]
end
L14["🎯 LESSON 1.4<br/>Theory of Change<br/><br/>Transforms foundation into:<br/>• Impact vision<br/>• Outcome pathways<br/>• Activity logic<br/>• Change assumptions"]
Module2["➡️ MODULE 2<br/>Operationalize<br/><br/>Community-grounded theory<br/>becomes implementation plan:<br/>• Logframe<br/>• Activities<br/>• Proposals<br/>• Budgets"]
L11 --> L12
L12 --> L13
L13 --> Outputs
O1 --> L14
O2 --> L14
O3 --> L14
O4 --> L14
L14 --> Module2
L11 -.->|Provides structure| L13
L12 -.->|Provides content| L13
O1 -.->|Effects → Impact| L14
O3 -.->|Priorities → Outcomes| L14
style L11 fill:#E12729,stroke:#B91C1C,color:#fff
style L12 fill:#F37324,stroke:#EA580C,color:#fff
style L13 fill:#F8CC1B,stroke:#CA8A04,color:#2A2A2A,stroke-width:3px
style Outputs fill:#007F4E,stroke:#00b369,color:#fff,stroke-width:2px
style O1 fill:#72B043,stroke:#5b7c37,color:#fff
style O2 fill:#72B043,stroke:#5b7c37,color:#fff
style O3 fill:#72B043,stroke:#5b7c37,color:#fff
style O4 fill:#72B043,stroke:#5b7c37,color:#fff
style L14 fill:#007F4E,stroke:#00b369,color:#fff,stroke-width:3px
style Module2 fill:#72B043,stroke:#007F4E,color:#fff,stroke-width:3px
Module 1 Completion: From Analysis to Action
Lesson 1.1 provided structure, 1.2 brought community voice, 1.3 synthesizes both. Four outputs feed Lesson 1.4's Theory of Change, then Module 2's logframes and budgets.
See also: Integration with Problem Tree
How to Use These Diagrams
For Learning
- • Start with Diagram 1 for the complete workflow
- • Study Diagrams 3 & 4 before your first workshop
- • Reference Diagram 5 for a concrete application
For Implementation
- • Print Diagram 1 as a workshop poster
- • Use Diagram 3 during capture, Diagram 4 when finalizing themes
- • Use Diagram 7 in proposals to show a disciplined approach
Related Resources
- • Four-Phase Process - Diagrams 1, 3, 4
- • Integration with Problem Tree - Diagrams 2, 7
- • Quality Checklist - Diagrams 4, 6
- • Examples - Diagram 5